Good night and good luck

Dec 9, 2005 | Uncategorized | 2 comments

Or, in this case, “Goodnight Moon.” From the NYT:

“Goodnight Moon,” the children's classic by Margaret Wise Brown, has gone smoke free. In a newly revised edition of the book, which has lulled children to sleep for nearly 60 years, the publisher, HarperCollins, has digitally altered the photograph of Clement Hurd, the illustrator, to remove a cigarette from his hand. HarperCollins said it made the change to avoid the appearance of encouraging smoking.

Tough one, huh? On the one hand, what's wrong with removing the suggestion that cigarette smoking is okay? On the other hand, Karen Karbo has plenty to say about that:

EXCELLENT start, HarperCollins, but why stop there? The text of “Goodnight Moon” itself is laden with messages that are potentially harmful to our youngest readers.

She goes on to suggest a number of changes, among them:

B. The blue stripes are adorable, but the reader has no way of knowing whether Bunny's pj's meet current flammability standards. Suggested change: digitally alter to include visible “flame resistant” label, in accordance with recommendations made by the Consumer Products Safety Commission. Digitally removing pj's is not an option.
C. Tell me this rug is not made of the skin of a Siberian tiger. Suggested change: Digitally remove to avoid appearance of condoning hunting of planet's endangered species.
D. How long has this bowl full of mush been sitting here? A single drop of sour milk contains more than 50 million potentially fatal bacteria. At the very least Bunny is in danger of contracting irritable bowel syndrome. Not to mention mush is low in fiber.
Suggested change: Digitally remove.
E. Balloons cause more choking deaths among 3- to 6-year-olds than any other toy. Suggested change: Digitally remove.

Karbo suggests 12 changes in all, each designed to bring the book up to modern PC standards. For more on this topic, visit NPR's interview with Karbo on Talk of the Nation.

It seems like a good idea to remove the cigarette, but how far do we go? Isn't it the parents' responsibility to make sure kids know right and wrong, good and bad, etc? Does HarperCollins really need to make that choice for them? Is this really a matter of HC trying to protect children, or is it more of a perceived sales factor? Could the cigarette's presence hurt sales? Is this censorship? Things to think about, that's for sure.

And what does any of this have to do with the George Clooney movie, Good Night and Good Luck? Well, McCarthy was all about censorship for one thing. And the cigarette smoking in this movie is downright amazing. I was shocked at how pervasive smoking was in the 50s. Murrow appeared on the air with a cigarette in his hand. Cigarette commercials were standard fare. Smoking at the office? Oh yeah.

The movie, btw, is FANTASTIC. Mike and I talked about it for days afterward. It's a must buy the instant it comes out on DVD. The soundtrack is pretty awesome too.

The Importance of Fantasy

Dec 7, 2005 | Uncategorized | 3 comments

NPR's Talk of the Nation discusses the importance of fantasy in children's literature.

C.S. Lewis wrote that “once every hundred years some wiseacre gets up and tries to banish the fairy tale.” Lewis also said the best fantasy worked for young and old alike. Authors of children's fantasy examine how that holds in today's literature.

Of course fantasy was high on my list as a child. Dr. Seuss, Cinderella, Snow White, Beauty and the Beast, Peter Pan, etc. I don't actually remember my mother reading to me, though she must have, mostly because from the moment I could read, I read books all the time. Thankfully my mother didn't restrict my reading back then (there was a time, when I was a teen, that she got a little wacky over a book and took it away from me, but that's another story).

Childish fantasy graduated to fantasy novels. Mary Stewart kept me enthralled with her Merlin stories. Tolkien, Frank Herbert (more appropriately SF), Robert Jordan, David Eddings, and others I've forgotten. For a while, I sampled fantasy like some folks hit the buffets on a cruise ship. But fantasy is difficult to sustain over time. The stories begin to sound alike. Country bumpkin goes on quest, turns out to be the ONE person who can save the world/universe/whatever. Personal trauma and growth ensue. It's a wonderful formula and yet boring at the same time.

Not that there aren't writers today who are turning the old formula on its head. I'm sure there are, but I just don't feel compelled to read it anymore. Harry Potter counts as fantasy (not the traditional fantasy we usually think of, but nevertheless) and I have read some of those.

The point, however, is that fantasy is important to the growing mind. It's also important to the writerly mind. Quest patterns become embedded in our psyche, Jung's collective unconscious, and we draw on them, consciously or unconsciously, to tell our stories. Without that well of knowledge, fiction is not possible. We all have a bedrock of myth that underpins our lives. The myths are universal across cultures, though with variations. (The modern fantasy novel is engaged with exploring the quest pattern.)

If the fantasy/fairy tale was truly to be banished (and I don't think this can be done, btw), storytelling would suffer. Thankfully, fantasy–the kind that creates magic when we are kids (Santa Claus, Harry Potter, Narnia, Bilbo Baggins, the Wizard of Oz)–is alive and well, as any trip to the movie theater or the children's section of the bookstore can attest.

Sweeeet – Napoleon Dynamite gets government recognition

Dec 6, 2005 | Uncategorized | 2 comments

I love this movie! Cool legislature. 🙂 Now go fix me a dang quesadilla.

LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Fifty-eighth Legislature First Regular Session – 2005 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES HOUSE CONCURRENT RESOLUTION NO. 29 BY WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE A CONCURRENT RESOLUTION STATING LEGISLATIVE FINDINGS AND COMMENDING JARED AND JERUSHA HESS AND THE CITY OF PRESTON FOR THE PRODUCTION OF THE MOVIE “NAPOLEON DYNAMITE.” Be It Resolved by the Legislature of the State of Idaho: WHEREAS, the State of Idaho recognizes the vision, talent and creativity of Jared and Jerusha Hess in the writing and production of “Napoleon Dynamite”; and

WHEREAS, the scenic and beautiful City of Preston, County of Franklin and the State of Idaho are experiencing increased tourism and economic growth; and WHEREAS, filmmaker Jared Hess is a native Idahoan who was educated in the Idaho public school system; and

WHEREAS, the Preston High School administration and staff, particularly the cafeteria staff, have enjoyed notoriety and worldwide attention; and

WHEREAS, tater tots figure prominently in this film thus promoting Idaho's most famous export; and

WHEREAS, the friendship between Napoleon and Pedro has furthered multiethnic relationships; and

WHEREAS, Uncle Rico's football skills are a testament to Idaho athletics; and

WHEREAS, Napoleon's bicycle and Kip's skateboard promote better air quality and
carpooling as alternatives to fuel-dependent methods of transportation; and

WHEREAS, Grandma's trip to the St. Anthony Sand Dunes highlights a long-honored Idaho vacation destination; and

WHEREAS, Rico and Kip's Tupperware sales and Deb's keychains and glamour shots promote entrepreneurism and self-sufficiency in Idaho's small towns; and

WHEREAS, Napoleon's artistic rendition of Trisha is an example of the importance of the visual arts in K-12 education; and

WHEREAS, the schoolwide Preston High School student body elections foster an awareness in Idaho's youth of public service and civic duty; and

WHEREAS, the “Happy Hands” club and the requirement that candidates for school president present a skit is an example of the importance of theater arts in K-12 education; and

WHEREAS, Pedro's efforts to bake a cake for Summer illustrate the positive connection between culinary skills to lifelong relationships; and

WHEREAS, Kip's relationship with LaFawnduh is a tribute to e-commerce and Idaho's technology-driven industry; and

WHEREAS, Kip and LaFawnduh's wedding shows Idaho's commitment to healthy marriages; and

WHEREAS, the prevalence of cooked steak as a primary food group pays tribute to Idaho's beef industry; and

WHEREAS, Napoleon's tetherball dexterity emphasizes the importance of physical
education in Idaho public schools; and

WHEREAS, Tina the llama, the chickens with large talons, the 4-H milk cows, and the Honeymoon Stallion showcase Idaho's animal husbandry; and

WHEREAS, any members of the House of Representatives or the Senate of the Legislature of the State of Idaho who choose to vote “Nay” on this concurrent resolution are “FREAKIN' IDIOTS!” and run the risk of having the “Worst Day of Their Lives!”

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the members of the First Regular Session of the Fifty-eighth Idaho Legislature, the House of Representatives and the Senate concurring therein, that we commend Jared and Jerusha Hess and the City of Preston for showcasing the positive aspects of Idaho's youth, rural culture, education system, athletics, economic prosperity and diversity.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that we, the members of the House of Representatives and the Senate of the State of Idaho, advocate always following your heart, and thus we eagerly await the next cinematic undertaking of Idaho's Hess family.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Chief Clerk of the House of Representatives be, and she is hereby authorized and directed to forward a copy of this resolution to Jared and Jerusha Hess, the Mayor of the City of Preston and the Principal of Preston High School. Statement of Purpose / Fiscal Impact

STATEMENT OF PURPOSE RS 15236 The purpose of this resolution is to recognize and commend Jared and Jerusha Hess for their cinematic talents by which they have increased the nation's awareness of Idaho.

NYT Notable Books — A Rant by PBW

Dec 2, 2005 | Uncategorized

Oh my gosh, this is too funny. Wish I'd thought of it!

Now, not to criticize the illustrious editor(s) who composed this gotta-read list, but the blurbs are so winchy they read like a muttered conversation between two badly shaven semi-stoned unpublished lit-heads at the local java joint on open mike poetry/ladies free latte night.

And it gets even better! I posted the partial list and link in an earlier entry, but never thought to take the hoity-toity language to task. Shame on me. Bravo, PBW!

The Lobster is REAL

Dec 2, 2005 | Uncategorized

No kidding. (See this post if you don't know what I'm talking about.)

From Publishers Weekly

The latest in Dedalus's Euro Shorts series is a surreal anti-fairy tale featuring a bizarre trio of star-crossed lovers. Plucked rudely from the sea, Lobster finds himself in a tank in the Titanic's dining room, watching in horror as Angelina, a beautiful young opium addict, devours his father. Lobster himself is dropped into boiling water three days later, but is saved when the Titanic hits the iceberg and, red but alive, he's sent careening through the flooding ship. He finds Angelina trapped in the death grip of her male companion, frees her with his pincers, realizes that he feels human lust for her and, in a startling scene, brings her to her first-ever orgasm. […]

(Feb.) Copyright © Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Some things are just too weird to be believed. I'm not compelled, but in case you are, buy the book and let me know how it works out, ‘kay?

(I know, I know, Leda and the Swan and all that, but it's just too bizarre for me to wrap my noggin around. I keep thinking of Dave Barry: “I personally see no significant difference between a lobster and, say, a giant Madagascar hissing cockroach. . . . I do not eat lobsters, although I once had a close call.”)

Bad Sex Award

Dec 2, 2005 | Uncategorized

It's that time of year again! No, not THAT time.

It's the time when The Guardian (UK) bestows its bad sex award.

Now in its 13th year, the prize, which only targets literary fiction, aims “to draw attention to the crude, tasteless, often perfunctory use of redundant passages of sexual description in the modern novel, and to discourage it.” The winner, who will be announced on December 1 at the In & Out Club in London, is awarded a semi-abstract statue representing sex in the 1950s and a bottle of champagne, if he or she turns up.

The article excerpts the nominees, but you can read the full passages here. I can't choose, they're so bad in their badness. But any passage that features a lobster having sex with a woman (yes, a LOBSTER!) gets my vote. I hope it's not really a lobster, I hope it's a metaphor for something else. Yeesh.